<![CDATA[BRANDING | PR | SPECIAL EVENTS | MULTIMEDIA | E-MAIL | GIFT LOUNGES | PRODUCT PLACEMENT - Brandtastically Yours Blog]]>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:32:13 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[You attract what you are attracted to: "Target customers that are most prone to pay."]]>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:15:49 GMThttp://jirehcreative.com/brandtastically-yours-blog/you-attract-what-you-are-attracted-toPicture
By now you've probably heard about the "fine felon" photo of Jeremy Meeks that went viral. If not, in short: it's a mug shot of a strikingly handsome man that has many women swooning.


The operative words in the last sentence are MUG SHOT! Meeks was arrested as a part of a massive weapons raid in Stockton, CA that involved the FBI! His arrest photo got over 50,000 likes in a day, the most the police department said they'd ever seen. The assumption is that the pic went viral because of his good looks.  
Any picture can be worth a thousand words, but the photo in question was only worth one: CRIMINAL, which did not seem to matter. 


Due to  the massive amount of publicity the photo generated people noticed his potential and mentally converted Meeks from a menace to a model.    Being attracted to him on the pages of a magazine would be completely understandable in such a context. Someone even photoshopped an image of the gang member dressed in a suit and looking like a male super model instead of a menace and marked it "What If."


How would this scenario of targeting customers with less than ideal traits unfold in the context of business?

In business the desired customers or customers a company finds attractive is called the target audience. Typically, members of the targeted group fit a specified demographics profile including such qualifiers as age, location, education and income.

    
What if a company only targeted consumers with the "potential" to pay  based on the principle that you attract what you are attracted to? If most traditional business models that approach would not work. Numerous business owners would go to bed hungry or shut their doors altogether.  


The initial desire of a business is to get  sales but ultimately the desired outcome is to obtain a long-lasting relationship or customer loyalty over an extended period of time.


Market research and prospecting are where the work of finding the right customer begins and it can't be based on looks alone. Client attraction combines  brand positioning and employing the right tools to gain customers form your target market.   For certain lifestyle brands and luxury brands in particular, an ideal client has to be able to afford the service or merchandise.  Attract the customers that not only loo good on paper but can afford your product or service and tell others on the same customer tier about you. Your efforts will be more worthwhile when you target the consumers that are most prone to pay.  




]]>
<![CDATA[Copycatting costume could be costly]]>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:36:40 GMThttp://jirehcreative.com/brandtastically-yours-blog/copycatting-costume-could-be-costlyBRANDUCATION 101 

As today is Halloween I wanted to talk about  "brand imposters," people subtly posing as others in the context of intellectual property.  

When the use of intellectual property starts to affect an entity's ability to make money or blurs the lines of ownership, is it still flattery?  Not so much.

R&B singer Robin Thicke has been in the news recently about  the use of a familiar background groove in his internationally popular hit "Blurred Lines." He's currently in a  plagiarism feud with the late Marvin Gaye's  children about allegedly sampling   Gaye's 1977 smash single, "Got to Give It Up." Thicke and crew (producer Pharrell and rapper  T.I) preemptively sued the Gaye estate after being accused of using Gaye's music. The Gaye family filed a counter suit against Thicke for a historic pattern of borrowing from Gaye's sound and style. Thicke has publicly acknowledged Gaye is one of his musical influences, but  the song in question is so reminiscent of the originator's style and sound he appears to be  "imitating or duplicating"  the "Trouble Man" singer. A New York Times critic noted that Thicke has attempted to be to "White Soul" what Gaye was/is to Black Soul the similarities.

Sampling is normal,so some people have wondered why Thicke won't just  fess up.  One reason may be that it is wrong (i.e., illegal) to sample music without giving credit at the onslaught of or prior to using the sample.  The definition of sampling is "the technique of digitally encoding music or sound and reusing it as part of a composition or recording." This is something Thicke said he has not done. In an interview he admitted he was inspired by "Got to Give It Up"but did not sample it and sought to create a similar groove.   If  Gaye's attorney wins this case it will set a precedent for intellectual property disputes by broadening the definition of plagiarism.  Not the mention the moolah the deceased artist's offspring could make.

While we are on the subject of "lifting" others' work, think about this: When you are on FB and see an event or something someone designed (jewelry, clothes, art, etc.) and you try to duplicate it after you saw it (and were not thinking of doing it prior to seeing someone else do it), is that stealing or a form of flattery?   Some believe that it is nearly impossible to prove copyright infringement or intellectual property claims in such instances.  I believe integrity should be your guide and nothing trumps originality. The Web is now a playground for taking ideas.  Many people want to treat the online space as if it is a gray area with regard to intellectual property.  The lines are not as blurred as they once were.  For instance the journalism community is beginning to bare down on "infojacking" because frequent copying online with no or improper attribution impacts credibility and rights of ownership of news entities among other things. 

In the initial example, it is important to note Gaye's style was his imprint, one that gave us a snapshot of his soul. That's where the line becomes blurry: Are you trying to be like the originator or replace it/them?  A USA Today writer details how admiration can cross the line here: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2013/10/30/gaye-lawsuit-robin-thicke/3315849/

'"God made you an original.  Don't die a copy." Author unknown)]]>